Below we see my public defender get into detail and have proof about me trying to mitigate my problem. There in fact was a payment plan in place to try and get me caught up and fix the situation. Then we see my public defender call out the prosecution for stating that I had no proof to back up my claims. Well in actuality, I DID.
Below we see again the Judge say that if someone was reading the black and white transcript that they would assume I was delusional because of my honest testimony in court. Then the Judge tries to make it look like I was yelling in court when in reality I was responding to the argumentative nature of the prosecution.
Above my public defender eloquently stated that there WAS NO PROOF WHATSOEVER THAT THERE WAS WRONGDOING WITH THOSE DEEDS AND THEY STILL ALLOWED IT INTO MY CASE, WHEN THEY SHOULDNT HAVE BEEN.
Here we see my attorney telling the court that we indeed had proof of possible of notary fraud and that I knew about these issues regarding potential notary fraud which explains my intent. The prosecution was steadfast on making it seem like my intent was to DE FRAUD Salvador Guevara, WHEN IN REALITY THAT WAS HIS PLAN FROM THE VERY BEGINNING AGAINST ME.
In lines 23-26 above we really see the LACK OF INTELLIGENCE BY THE JUDGE. He asks the question; IN WHAT WAY WOULD A NOTARY FRAUD HAVE ANYTHING TO DO WITH THIS CASE. When my home was FALSELY sold at auction on 11/07/12 the notary that was used three months later got her NOTARY LICENSE REVOKED. If there was Notary fraud on the instrument used to sell my home, then the SUPPOSED SALE IS NOT VALID. If the notary republic lost their license three months after working on documentation for my home, it is safe to assume that my home might have been involved in fraudulent activity AS WELL. I assumed they would at least check to prove me wrong. Nope, they did not even do that because they already knew the answer.
What the judge was ignoring is that if Brenda Perez lost her Notary license because she got caught in a fraud scheme which had to do with her name being robo-signed at the direction of SPS/LPS at the direction of LORRAINE BROWN, the sale is not valid. HOW IS THIS INFORMATION NOT PROBATIVE? If she went to jail in a massive fraud scheme? How is this not probative if her company is on all of the deeds used to TAKE MY HOME?
